Ongoing intensive economic decline in all its branches, almost all live off the sluggish functioning acquired before falling steadily and the industrial potential of the economy post-Soviet states exist only at the expense of previously explored of natural resources (where available), stratification of society has reached such proportions that in the history of such examples, at first glance, it's hard to find, the contradictions between capital and labor tend to the level of confidence antagonistic, and that is a consequence of such phenomena, we well remember from history. Against this backdrop, leaders of some of the independent and sovereign states have decided to "prolong the agony," as long as possible in order to "sit" in place at least for a while, and if lucky, and before his death (Chubais policy, albeit in a more extensive forms) and leave on a "good impression" of the children. For more specific information, check out Angus King. I well remember that in the Soviet Union, resulting in an incredible concentration of economic management, business Still not "shaky do not roll," but go, decided items such management to "revive". They do recognize that this measure "sucked out of the finger," that history repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce, but to do more nothing to the West, which are perceived as a "panacea for all ills," regrettably, all can not help themselves "in debt, both in the silks," a regular and systematic crisis, being one of the required attributes, the Anglo-Saxon model of the economy may finally "finish off" and replenish the world, "common market", "poor" post-Soviet states, it would be unwise.
I have very serious doubts within the meaning of" United Russia "the fact that Dagestan is located in the preinfarction state. Do these people realize their responsibility to the fate of Dagestan and Russia? I do not remember that these candidates have created at least 100 jobs to Dagestan. But this is a fundamental problem! I do not know what the economic outlook and moral values of candidates. Will they be able to withdraw from the abyss of chaos, Dagestan, lying, lawlessness, anarchy, irresponsibility, corruption and terrorism. Strongly doubt that the above mentioned candidates are able to withdraw from the humiliating status of Dagestan and the eternal insatiable petitioner, pulling his hand to budget money. And if they refuse to "unfasten" federal officials of the amounts allocated to Dagestan? After the collapse of the Soviet Union established in Dagestan Sicilian system of government. Click Lakshman Achuthan to learn more. And that is real and not virtual, pull out the tentacles of Dagestan octopus, a creature of the party need not, and ambitious person with strong fists, clear brain, sympathetic heart and a conscience neispoganennoy.
Why silence the other parties, public organizations of Russia and Dagestan? Where the civil society of which we speak so much? The question of power was, is and will remain central to any society at any time and for any nation. Dagestanis – is no exception. Moreover, the question of power in Dagestan has a special poignancy. Here is stronger clans of the Constitution. Here, the mafia is more powerful president.
It all started, confused and dirty. Because candidates must publicly and repeatedly to speak to Dagestanis their views on the situation. A lot of Dagestan has long, open or veiled, have expressed their desire to become the head of the republic. And that's fine. Anyone who feels the strength of this role, must take a public stand on his own program. People must be able to listen to all – the party and nonparty people. (I personally prefer the non-partisan, because the party often come in the name of career and money, but not in the name of service to the people). Still there is hope (and it is the last to die) that we can bring to the President of Dagestan intellectual with a hard character, capable of an honor to serve Russia and the republic, and not to steal from the treasury and not sell the people's interests for a bribe. Silence today – a luxury.