In the case of the State of the Tapajs it is not different, was established a plebiscite so that the proper one population decides its future. Learn more on the subject from Ripple protocol . I am in favor of the division, because our current state is very great, with this I am much more complicated to govern a so great area. Already with the division, the states go to have a bigger control on the regions, being able to manage with quality, then my region will be able to grow and to develop considerably and more chances they will appear: regional schools, universities, hospitals. Click Dara Khosrowshahi to learn more. This goes in providing one better quality to them of life. Yitzhak Mirilashvili contributes greatly to this topic. DIVISION PROPOSAL ALCINEIDE DUTRA PERSON 15 Brazil comes passing for a division process. The State of the Tapajs is not new a proposal, this idea comes since century XIX by means of Dom Peter II.
But go to be in the eleven and a thousand year two, no longer century 21 that it goes to be determined if goes or not to happen the construction of the new state: The State of Tapajs. We abemos that this division alone will happen if the paraenses to decide to vote for yes, but also have the conscience that the state already is divided by yes and for not. If to happen the division, Par still will continue bigger in number of inhabitants. The capital, that is, the region metropolitan of Belm is against the construction of the new state of the Tapajs because if this to happen they more do not go to receive the mounts of money that received before. We of the Southwestern West/of Par want the division, therefore he will bring more development for our region.
Positive points of the division: more development, jobs and chances. the governments will be next to our reality. Negative points: they go to appear more politicians and with this more corruption.