Eduardo Riaviz

In fact, the desire to know ' ' what the other wants of me? ' ' dirige it its recognition for the other, therefore searchs to know on the desire of the other. As its anguish has origin in the lack that it is present, the castration, its search consists of knowing on the proper desire, the object. Fanoel Messias Dos Santos, the Transference the Failure Pertaining to school. I agree to a psychoanalytic colleague and also professor when it says that the professors are treated as merchandise and that to each day the Subject Presumption To know, that is, the transference of the pupil for the professor is each shaken time more. The citizen after-modern, for being speech effect and of a speech that emerged by means of the fall of the father, that is, the capitalist speech, is a citizen for who the desire is not lack, seno whim, will of joy.

The desire of the citizen after-modern is joy will because the speech capitalist has the logical insensata and fierce she supereu it. More: we could say that the capitalist speech is it supereu of the citizen ' ' after-moderno' '. Capitalist speech and supereu is articulated in one same imperative: ' ' It enjoys! ' ' , but not of the imperative of the resignation, as it commanded it supereu ' ' moderno' ' , and yes in a infernal and limitless way, technician enjoys of the object, the object that is effect of the speech of science. Eduardo Riaviz – Modernity, after-modernity fundamentalismo (a lacaniana reading) Which the difference enters the ideal of I and ideal I of the pupils of the decade of the 60 and pupils of century XXI? We can call these two elements substructures of the Supereu. Freud reference they in its text of 1914, ' ' On the narcissism: one introduo' ' Ideal I am, for Lacan, an imaginary, inheriting formation of the image of itself, that he consists in the Stadium of the Mirror.