The Group

The saint of each son has personal character e, therefore, it must have a special name that identifique.26 In this way, Nana places it the disposal of the preparation necessary to serve contents Iyemanj and waits that its devotion can contribute with the possible reintegration of Aru in the community protected for this orix, therefore the disobedience to it of it moved away and isolated, becoming it other people’s the group. To if excluding from the Aru group it will pass for a depersonalization process, of identitria, similar crisis what Firmino, while excluded of the community, demonstrated to be. All its being was pure disaggregation. However it speaks as white, however as black. Its speech reproduced the assimilacionista state of the white culture why it passed, renegando its origin. Therefore, to firm themselves as person, the necessary black if to deny, but as it has that to be he himself, it enters in total contradiction.

In the Aru city it will have that if to collate, if to fortify in the matrical inheritances not to yield to the assimilacionismo. Therefore in this process it will suffer, as they suffer the majority from the blacks of this country, a desvirtuamento of its identity. New social environment, which will adentrar, persists in denying its people, its culture, its religion taking them to search it affirmation in its proper auto-negation. The process of social relations, in the perspective of the socialization of the individual or group, is a basic element in the plan of the identity of the person human being. ' ' The identity of the black enters in crisis in the measure where its socialization will be given in a difficult picture, in view of that the identity of the person is configuration of groups and categories social and in this the black is cindido in the social relation, therefore the social parameters consist in aspects superstructures that denied the ontolgica condition of negro' '.

The Group

Halbwachs affirms that always we live our experiences in relation with that they surround in them, and these, in some way, constitute the references for our perception. Slight knowledge and images that we apply to these experiences are taken by the social environment where we live. It is for affirming the intrinsically social character of the human being that the author cannot seno perceive the supported individual memory in the collective memory. In more, if the collective memory strap its force and its duration of the fact to have for support a set of men, not obstante they is individuals that if they remember, while members of the group. Of this mass of common souvenirs, and that if they apiam one on the other, are not the same ones that they will appear with more intensity for each one of them. We would say voluntarily that each individual memory is a point of view on the collective memory, that this dumb point of view as the place that I occupy there, and that this exactly dumb place according to relations that I keep with other ways. It is not to admire that of the common instrument nor all use to advantage in a similar way.

However when we try to explain this diversity, we always come back to a combination of influences that are, all, of social nature. (HALBWACHS, 1990, p.51). We can say that the convivncia and the dialogue are involved processes in this phenomenon of the memory. In the ticket above, we can stand out some aspects important to think the relation between individual and collective memory. First, the individuals remember as members of groups; second, the collective memory has for support the set of the people who integrate the group; third, the common instrument is the memory collective; room, the individual memory is a point of view of the collective memory; finally, that this point of view is changeable, depending on the relations with other social ways.