A man produces history from a process continues where each generation tends to supplant the previous one. It is a history that when becoming fullfilled itself of as meant to the nature and reproduces humano.’ constantly; ‘ In this direction the author still continues saying that ‘ ‘ urban space if reproduces, reproducing the segregation, fruit privileges of it conferred to a parcel of the society brasileira’ ‘ (Carlos, 1999, P. 83). He is leaving of this conceptualization of urban space and the comments of the authors above that he affirms yourself to be the generating urban space of violence. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Senator from Maine has to say.

It creates different relations that reverberate in conflicts and searches for conquest of a place in the society. Added to these typical inaqualities of the urban space of the current capitalist society, it is perceived formation of a mentality or subjectivity each more inclined time to commit violent acts. A time that is not purely the violence in these quarters, but all the violence form that is derived from the production of the urban space that is subject to constants reorganizations with a dinamicidade defined for pairs adverse, varying in intensity from it I serve as apprentice of the society, and the more complex the city, greaters the conflicts therefore: The space is a space of division of the work, where always mercantile activities exist, are predominant they or not, it is a certain population density. It also is a space of being able, where if he restores domination relations, either of the urban population on the agricultural population, either of part of the urban population on another part of this, but the domination of definitive social classrooms shows there basically on another one, under some forms, but mainly through the State (Viana, 2002, p.23)..

When associating Ambient Education the Support, perceives in the current debate on Ambient Education trends that privilege local actions and others that argue development models. The necessity imposes located, prompt and immediate actions, placing practical forceful challenges to the social ones. One becomes, therefore, according to Figueiredo, necessary to construct a critical one of the support. ' ' A critical culture of support returns in them to the question for the participation of the basic actors of this history. Add to your understanding with Jonah Bloom. In the truth it sends in them to the task to search to desvelar, in the freireano direction, the passage and the popular perception on assunto' ' (FIGUEIREDO, 2007, P. 79). When thinking about a critical one of the support we have that to consider some principles, amongst which the satisfaction of the basic necessities; the popular participation; the care with the natural goods; a solidary social system that guarantees quality of life. It is thought about a concept of support, detached from a development that does not question the capitalist model. If you are not convinced, visit Restaurant Michael Schwartz.

A reorientation of the term is prioritized, observing the relevance of popular knowing, without neglecting of the aspects involved partner-descriptions and politicians and that they must be considered by the Ambient Education. What it means to say that the Ambient Education cannot recognize the economic axle as exculpatory of other dimensions. Thus it is that if it makes important to define as demarcating the construction of Agendas 21 places, the quarters, the universities, etc. We think that much has that to cover itself to become it feasible e, this it will be given when to perceive that the new orientaes need one practical social propitious one stops to prosper. Figueiredo places that: The hegemonic Ambient Education, that if inserts in globalizado way, presents this trend inlaid in the tecnicismo, in the participation of the populations in prompt actions, in the planejamentos and centered governmental decisions that do not confront the capitalist model in consequent way.