Nietzsche Human

INTERIOR ENEMIES (Adapted of the Human, Too much Human workmanship.) The Christianity fold that the man is conceived and been born in the sin. Therefore, the biggest sin of the man is to have been born. We can understand that for the sectrias and pessimistic religions, the procreation act is considered as bad in itself exactly, representing an immorality to be contained and to be fought. During much time, it was had as required that the sensuality was declared pernicious and heretical, being that the danger of the perpetual conviction was so narrowly on to the idea of the sensuality that, very probably, during many centuries the Christians had only exerted the sexuality with much remorse and the main end to generate children. The Christian pessimists deturparam the nature human being, associating with the natural element the idea of interior enemy. One created an internal war and a constant alternation of the victory and the defeat. For in such a way, they had needed an adversary, finding it in the interior enemy, thus creating, in the mind human being the sin idea.

Empdocles, Greek philosopher, did not see nothing of shameful or of devilish in the erticas things, for the opposite, it saw in Afrodite the guarantee that the discord would not reign perpetual, but that it one day would go to more deliver cetro to a deity indulgente. However, the Christian pessimists desired that another opinion was dominant, populating the solitude and the desert spiritual of the life human being with an alive enemy always and universally known, stopping a perpetual fight and remaining themselves in constant penance to fight it and to overwhelm it, always under the orders of the church. He must yourself be recognized as the men if they become worse for assigning as bad what he is inevitably natural. Such is the procedure of the church and the patrsticos Metaphysical that wanted that the man if recognized by its very nature as bad and pecador, being necessary supernatural forces to exempt it of the pack of the sin. The intention was not to become the redeemed man most moral and, but that it felt the most possible pecador, similar of that it was kept under the domain and I judge of Church. Therefore, Nietzsche opened the eyes of the man to visualize natural with a simple element and without meaconing, removing the idea of sin and pessimism of its genealgico DNA. God, supreme goodness, that everything created for the harmony human being, did not make of pecaminoso the affective relation something. The release of sectrios and pessimistic concepts planted in the mind human being, during long centuries, if makes necessary, aiming at to the full evolution of the integral man, come back to the intangible truths of the life.

The PROBLEM OF The LAW JOUST

This exactly country if moves away from its primary ideology, restoring a doubt on the effective operational system, what it is not very different of our reality, the Brazilian judiciary system, carries through walked its for the abyss. This way all delay the processes complete nothing more nothing less of what approximately ten years of judicial movement, for the presentation of a solution with regard to the presented demand. . With this we are far from knowing the efficiency legal, and as sympathetical of the philosophy we must search an agreement on what it is really to be ‘ ‘ justo’ ‘ in all its directions, since the ability and attributions of the state that must co-ordinate and improve its judicial system. As well as later we must search the agreement on the true one felt of justice when carrying through the facts of ours relation human being always stops with the world having visualizing the natural balance of all the things, without proceeding with judgments and decisions insensatas.

Ahead of all the argument and possible questioning, let us make us it boarding on the PROBLEM OF the LAW JOUST. The RIGHT IN ITS PRECISE MEANING Initially, before if saying of the subject justice, must be boarded the right in its precise meaning, that is, to speak of justice without mentioning the right, is at least disproportionate of form that the right in its real direction is propeller of the meaning of justice, therefore the right uses in its totality the justice concept. To understand the note carried through, let us make the following example, in an independent society of its creed, social aspect or cultural, this society will be emanated by normative, moral regiments and social, let us say that in one definitive case, two people argue the determined right of property of one local one, this society by means of its jurisdictional agent, that is, the judge will have to bring has both the solution of the attrition demanded in process, at this moment appears the knowledge of its right, each involved agent in the conflict must know its rights and obligations..