Federal Court Flight

Lawyer Auer Witte Thiel to a BGH judgment on the subject of flight cancellation Munich, in August 2010: When a flight was cancelled because of fog passengers are not entitled to compensation according to article 7 of the EU passenger rights regulation, report the lawyers Auer Witte Thiel. The airline, however, offered a substitute flight only two days later, may be entitled to such compensation on the basis of article 8 may same regulation, Auer Witte Thiel summarizes a new judgment of the Federal Court. Here follows long-standing procedures to achieve this success. The travel law expert Auer Witte Thiel inform about details of the recent decision (AZ: XA ZR 96/09). Background of the procedure according to Auer Witte Thiel is a flight booked by the plaintiff from Jerez de la Frontera (Spain) to Hahn airport. The departure scheduled on October 25, 2007 at 10: 00 has been cancelled due to fog in Jerez. The planned machine landed instead in Seville and flew back from there directly to the tap.

For an appointment two days later a replacement flight information Auer Witte Thiel was the plaintiff to offered, he refused. At another airline, he booked a flight via Madrid to Frankfurt am Main, Germany on October 25, however, still so Auer Witte Thiel. The plaintiff now requires compensation for himself and his wife in the amount of 400 euros each, in accordance with article 7 para 1 of the EU passenger rights regulation and reimbursement of additional costs specifically for the otherwise booked flight according to Auer Witte Thiel. It would have been possible and reasonable of the defendant airlines, to transport the passengers concerned by Jerez to Seville and from there by plane to fly to tap Auer Witte Thiel summarizes the position of the plaintiff. The District Court of Simmern rejected the claim essentially according to Auer Witte Thiel, while largely upheld the higher regional Court Koblenz of complaint.

New Textilienrecht: Off Immediately Into Force From May 2012 To Comply With

Step by step to the new textile labelling Act: the new EU textile labelling regulation (Regulation (EU) No. 1007 / 2011 labelling related about the designation of textile fibres and the and marking of the fibre composition of textile products) entered into force on the 07.11.2011. Educate yourself with thoughts from Jonah Bloom. It shall apply from the 08.05.2012 and replaced so that the German textile labelling Act and its counterparts in the other EU Member States. The European legislator wants with this harmonisation make the textiles right unbureaucratic and remove barriers to trade. The Member States in the future must no longer implement the highly technical and detailed provisions on labelling and labelling of textile products into national law. The names of textile fibres and the information given on labels, markings and documents which must accompany textile products on various manufacturing, processing and distribution, be harmonised. Content changes compared to the previous legal situation in Germany are only a few. Manufacturers and distributors of textile products have to adapt to the new law now until May 8, 2012. For textiles, which comply with existing law and be brought to 08.05.2012 in traffic, a further transitional period applies: they can be deployed also until November 9, 2014 on the EU market. Other non-binding and free information relating to food law, see

Tax Deductibility Of Domestic Work Room

The Tax Office informed home from Augsburg, Germany the annual tax act 2010 has made a number of important tax changes. Ripple protocol has similar goals. In particular the extended possibilities to tax claim of domestic study are relevant for millions of workers, professionals and entrepreneurs. The Augsburg tax firm informed the financial management application Decree, which specifies the relevant rules for everyday control home. Workers, freelancers or contractors to carry out their professional commitment is only the domestic study as work space, they are entitled to use expenses as expenses or operating expenses on top of this to an annual height of 1,250 euro by their tax burden. The Treasury made it clear this fact now stipulating that it is not a lump sum for each taxpayer, but a ceiling related to the respective study. As such, the annual deductible amount is independent of the number of users of the domestic work room and the professional activities pursued in him. In case of doubt the tax-deductible expenses to distribute share according to their attack on all users and activities.

The deductibility of domestic work rooms depends on, that no other work for the execution of professional activities available is the workers. Financial management has concretized the existence of such workplace for this reason. Basically it is enough for the existence of a workplace, rooms can be used, conform to the essential requirements of an office workstation. Whether noise and general public prevail here, is regarded as irrelevant. Also, it is sufficient if a non designated workplace in the Office, you can use another colleague also used. Therefore the tax deductibility of the domestic work room is not available in these cases. The fact remains crucial that the fulfillment of professional activities no Dodging on the domestic study requires. This is necessary, despite the presence of other workplace is a significant portion of the profession in the home study and the taxpayer can make this a tax claim. Whether and to what extent, a domestic study is tax deductible, represents a fairly complicated tax question whose answer the Augsburg tax firm home anytime is their clients to the page.