Bona fide members as contests and tender and does claim that the law of tenders and auctions contrary to the rights of the consumer. Reason for this has accumulated a lot. Comment on the status of public procurement and the use of 94-FZ, we turned to Basil Bee, director of integration and innovative firms ‘Cascade Complex’ According to Vasily Nikolaevich established practices of the 94th law enforcement of federal law in such a form in which it is often the place to be, detrimental to the economy, not only the region but the country as a whole. In addition, due to the fact that the question most often is only in lowering prices, which in turn directly affects the quality and organization of the consumer loses the right to free choice of the supplier work or services – all directly or indirectly contrary to the legitimate right of the consumer – the right choice. Hear other arguments on the topic with Twin Cities. On any of the markets, companies are guided by customer needs. Commercial entities must provide the consumer quality, reasonable price for it, and We must choose a user by analyzing our services, our ability to work poorly or qualitatively.
It should have the right to choose – I am sure Basil Bee. 94-FL deprive consumers of this possibility. Vadim Belyaevs opinions are not widely known. By means of tendering, bidding, auction or quotation he imposed an unknown company that knows how to do the job.