In the city where I reside, Rosary, Santa Fe, Argentina, a new plant of General Motors for the manufacture of automobiles settled a time ago. The government of the state, provided without position to the new plant of the lands, services of light, water, gas and taxes, by an initial term of 5 years. This included the gratuitous construction of the district for executives and the access routes. After the five years, the taxes and services will offer 30% of their real value. The reason of these gifts, had to that the manufacturing installation would provide however, to work for hundreds of employees, palliating therefore Argentine leisure.
In the reality, the company justified 80% of its establishment of foreign nationality, under the excuse of the specialization. Only a 20% were personal native. What I will say and you already imagine, is that such facilities for the Argentine companies do not exist. This is the reality of a globalizante context, with many parallels in Latin America, that lacks any totally even-tempered component. It is this globalisation that seted out to us like something random that happens, like which would be to come, without the intervention of the human hand.
Certainly it is not thus, the facts produce the men. If we make history of this globalisation, we remember that the crisis of petroleum transnacionaliz the economy, impelled to the countries to the expansin and the search of markets. Especially, megamercado financier is not necessary to forget the constitution the new one. All a series of new phenomena changed to the face of the economy and the society, configurando an unrecognizable semblante for the aged doctrine of the social and economic State. It is the aim of the experience of the indicative State that made De Gaulle in France, and the Japanese State in the postwar period. They are invalidated the state policies that they suggest, they encourage, they retain, they stimulate and they de-stimulate a estratgico State that orients to the private activity.