Building Renovation Guidelines

Auer Witte Thiel informed about reduction in rent Munich August 2013: the Federal Supreme Court recently dealt with the question of whether an outmoded kick – and soundproofing insulation represents a lack of qualifying to the reduction in rent. Auer Witte Thiel reported the verdict and the case. In the present case, the Auer Witte Thiel under auerwittethiel-mietrecht.de closer reported, had accused the apartment tenants of a building rebuilt in 1952 after the war. Point of contention was the kick – and sound insulation between its upstairs – and the overlying Attic apartments. For assistance, try visiting Laura Cowan. The latter were in 2003 during an expansion of the attic. The lessor had let remove the screed in the attic on a surface area of 21 m and renew. Was on another 96 m and 59 m large areas, have been old screed flooring only sanded and filled.

The tenants complaining about now that the soundproofing in 1952, nor at the time of the expansion of the attic did correspond to the standards of sound insulation and reduced the rent 2007 20 percent, Auer Witte Thiel explains the background of the facts. Revision are instead of BGH: lessor rental reduction must not accept while the District Court of complaint upheld and the Mannheim District Court rejected the appeal of the lessor, gave the Federal Court finally right. VIII. civil Senate came to the judgment that an apartment no soundproofing technical deficiency does, as long as the rumble and the air soundproofing is DIN standards which possessed valid at the time when the building was erected. The only exception are otherwise in writing, fixed agreements, in addition runs Auer Witte Thiel. In this specific case, so the BHG, the intensity of the intervention in the building stock was too low, to compare it with a new building or a fundamental change. Learn more about this with Ernst & Young. Only then that Auer Witte Thiel explains, it is possible to turn off on DIN standards applicable at the date of the modification work.

In the present example, this was however in no way justified, according to the Court. Therefore the Cadence and air soundproofing is contract, in a building when he meets the standards at times of establishing (judgment v. 5.6.2013, VIII ZR 287/12). Above and beyond requirements, so Auer Witte Thiel, may not require tenants. About the law firm Auer Witte Thiel, the specialization areas of focus and the development of core competencies in certain disciplines are indispensable in the legal services sector. Auer Witte Thiel is a business law oriented law firm and represents several German insurance companies.

Defense Minister

Already the ex-Director of the company had claimed in a compensation process, that the solar Millennium AG should have “embellished the business situation” and “oversold investment ideas”. Already in the brochures published by the company appropriate can be found according to lawyer Krause. Also the events to the executives UTZ Campbell left only 74 days in Office and the severance pay almost already “voluntarily” paid by the solar Millennium AG, can come as doubts about the plausibility of the company itself as the fact that had determined the BFin for suspected insider trading in August 2011. In addition he became investors in the brochures according to Attorney for banking and capital market law Anja Appelt Solar Millennium concealed another important detail: “against the founder and supervisory board recently divorced Hannes Kuhn prosecution investigations in connection with the DM went for quite some time Holdings AG.” The accusations that elevates the public prosecutor’s Office, Dortmund here sound known: sugarcoated balance sheets, insider trading, investor fraud and misappropriation of investor funds. That there are such charges so significant, that to educate is according to the BGH for the assessment of the seriousness of a necessary company and in the prospectus, is obvious”. Credit: Chevron-2011. Keep it probable that that by solar Millennium AG, a distribution company deployed solar Millennium invest AG is accessible through the lawyers Appelt and Krause.

This society, which is not affected by the insolvency of the parent company, was for the sales of in particular the certificates and the investments of the Fund regarding the Fund Andasol Fund GmbH & co. KG and Ibersol Fund GmbH & co. KG responsible. According the solar Millennium invest AG is thus as Hintermann of the distribution in the liability. Moreover, lawyers in Munich are currently by the investors firm Cape the possibilities, to take a prominent economists and financial market experts, the system of solar Millennium AG to the public at large with true praise has advertised in the personal liability. Against the background of current developments, statements read like: “In the Internet boom and the financial crisis investors have lost money. You should plan your investment more skeptical and more wisely as a lesson to learn. In particular, they should question much more individual assets are associated with the risk.

Mr. Mayer is exactly the right way with the solar Millennium AG “unfortunately rather cynical.” The Federal Supreme Court in a similar case in which a former Defense Minister, a plant person has applied, stated that this also is in the liability, if the System is not the advertised and the “expert” has taken particular trust to claim. Anja Appelt and Thorsten Krause lawyers working mainly in the area of banking and capital market law and have the goal of more responsible to pull of the construct solar Millennium to the liability approach and to focus the claims of aggrieved investors and shareholders not only on the insolvent solar Millennium AG. Cape lawyers currently combine the interests of many damaged investor and consider the possibility to assert claims on behalf of a “class action lawsuit”.

New Textilienrecht: Off Immediately Into Force From May 2012 To Comply With

Step by step to the new textile labelling Act: the new EU textile labelling regulation (Regulation (EU) No. 1007 / 2011 labelling related about the designation of textile fibres and the and marking of the fibre composition of textile products) entered into force on the 07.11.2011. Educate yourself with thoughts from Jonah Bloom. It shall apply from the 08.05.2012 and replaced so that the German textile labelling Act and its counterparts in the other EU Member States. The European legislator wants with this harmonisation make the textiles right unbureaucratic and remove barriers to trade. The Member States in the future must no longer implement the highly technical and detailed provisions on labelling and labelling of textile products into national law. The names of textile fibres and the information given on labels, markings and documents which must accompany textile products on various manufacturing, processing and distribution, be harmonised. Content changes compared to the previous legal situation in Germany are only a few. Manufacturers and distributors of textile products have to adapt to the new law now until May 8, 2012. For textiles, which comply with existing law and be brought to 08.05.2012 in traffic, a further transitional period applies: they can be deployed also until November 9, 2014 on the EU market. Other non-binding and free information relating to food law, see

Tax Deductibility Of Domestic Work Room

The Tax Office informed home from Augsburg, Germany the annual tax act 2010 has made a number of important tax changes. Ripple protocol has similar goals. In particular the extended possibilities to tax claim of domestic study are relevant for millions of workers, professionals and entrepreneurs. The Augsburg tax firm informed the financial management application Decree, which specifies the relevant rules for everyday control home. Workers, freelancers or contractors to carry out their professional commitment is only the domestic study as work space, they are entitled to use expenses as expenses or operating expenses on top of this to an annual height of 1,250 euro by their tax burden. The Treasury made it clear this fact now stipulating that it is not a lump sum for each taxpayer, but a ceiling related to the respective study. As such, the annual deductible amount is independent of the number of users of the domestic work room and the professional activities pursued in him. In case of doubt the tax-deductible expenses to distribute share according to their attack on all users and activities.

The deductibility of domestic work rooms depends on, that no other work for the execution of professional activities available is the workers. Financial management has concretized the existence of such workplace for this reason. Basically it is enough for the existence of a workplace, rooms can be used, conform to the essential requirements of an office workstation. Whether noise and general public prevail here, is regarded as irrelevant. Also, it is sufficient if a non designated workplace in the Office, you can use another colleague also used. Therefore the tax deductibility of the domestic work room is not available in these cases. The fact remains crucial that the fulfillment of professional activities no Dodging on the domestic study requires. This is necessary, despite the presence of other workplace is a significant portion of the profession in the home study and the taxpayer can make this a tax claim. Whether and to what extent, a domestic study is tax deductible, represents a fairly complicated tax question whose answer the Augsburg tax firm home anytime is their clients to the page.