Defense Minister

Already the ex-Director of the company had claimed in a compensation process, that the solar Millennium AG should have “embellished the business situation” and “oversold investment ideas”. Already in the brochures published by the company appropriate can be found according to lawyer Krause. Also the events to the executives UTZ Campbell left only 74 days in Office and the severance pay almost already “voluntarily” paid by the solar Millennium AG, can come as doubts about the plausibility of the company itself as the fact that had determined the BFin for suspected insider trading in August 2011. In addition he became investors in the brochures according to Attorney for banking and capital market law Anja Appelt Solar Millennium concealed another important detail: “against the founder and supervisory board recently divorced Hannes Kuhn prosecution investigations in connection with the DM went for quite some time Holdings AG.” The accusations that elevates the public prosecutor’s Office, Dortmund here sound known: sugarcoated balance sheets, insider trading, investor fraud and misappropriation of investor funds. That there are such charges so significant, that to educate is according to the BGH for the assessment of the seriousness of a necessary company and in the prospectus, is obvious”. Credit: Chevron-2011. Keep it probable that that by solar Millennium AG, a distribution company deployed solar Millennium invest AG is accessible through the lawyers Appelt and Krause.

This society, which is not affected by the insolvency of the parent company, was for the sales of in particular the certificates and the investments of the Fund regarding the Fund Andasol Fund GmbH & co. KG and Ibersol Fund GmbH & co. KG responsible. According the solar Millennium invest AG is thus as Hintermann of the distribution in the liability. Moreover, lawyers in Munich are currently by the investors firm Cape the possibilities, to take a prominent economists and financial market experts, the system of solar Millennium AG to the public at large with true praise has advertised in the personal liability. Against the background of current developments, statements read like: “In the Internet boom and the financial crisis investors have lost money. You should plan your investment more skeptical and more wisely as a lesson to learn. In particular, they should question much more individual assets are associated with the risk.

Mr. Mayer is exactly the right way with the solar Millennium AG “unfortunately rather cynical.” The Federal Supreme Court in a similar case in which a former Defense Minister, a plant person has applied, stated that this also is in the liability, if the System is not the advertised and the “expert” has taken particular trust to claim. Anja Appelt and Thorsten Krause lawyers working mainly in the area of banking and capital market law and have the goal of more responsible to pull of the construct solar Millennium to the liability approach and to focus the claims of aggrieved investors and shareholders not only on the insolvent solar Millennium AG. Cape lawyers currently combine the interests of many damaged investor and consider the possibility to assert claims on behalf of a “class action lawsuit”.

New Textilienrecht: Off Immediately Into Force From May 2012 To Comply With

Step by step to the new textile labelling Act: the new EU textile labelling regulation (Regulation (EU) No. 1007 / 2011 labelling related about the designation of textile fibres and the and marking of the fibre composition of textile products) entered into force on the 07.11.2011. Educate yourself with thoughts from Jonah Bloom. It shall apply from the 08.05.2012 and replaced so that the German textile labelling Act and its counterparts in the other EU Member States. The European legislator wants with this harmonisation make the textiles right unbureaucratic and remove barriers to trade. The Member States in the future must no longer implement the highly technical and detailed provisions on labelling and labelling of textile products into national law. The names of textile fibres and the information given on labels, markings and documents which must accompany textile products on various manufacturing, processing and distribution, be harmonised. Content changes compared to the previous legal situation in Germany are only a few. Manufacturers and distributors of textile products have to adapt to the new law now until May 8, 2012. For textiles, which comply with existing law and be brought to 08.05.2012 in traffic, a further transitional period applies: they can be deployed also until November 9, 2014 on the EU market. Other non-binding and free information relating to food law, see

Tax Deductibility Of Domestic Work Room

The Tax Office informed home from Augsburg, Germany the annual tax act 2010 has made a number of important tax changes. Ripple protocol has similar goals. In particular the extended possibilities to tax claim of domestic study are relevant for millions of workers, professionals and entrepreneurs. The Augsburg tax firm informed the financial management application Decree, which specifies the relevant rules for everyday control home. Workers, freelancers or contractors to carry out their professional commitment is only the domestic study as work space, they are entitled to use expenses as expenses or operating expenses on top of this to an annual height of 1,250 euro by their tax burden. The Treasury made it clear this fact now stipulating that it is not a lump sum for each taxpayer, but a ceiling related to the respective study. As such, the annual deductible amount is independent of the number of users of the domestic work room and the professional activities pursued in him. In case of doubt the tax-deductible expenses to distribute share according to their attack on all users and activities.

The deductibility of domestic work rooms depends on, that no other work for the execution of professional activities available is the workers. Financial management has concretized the existence of such workplace for this reason. Basically it is enough for the existence of a workplace, rooms can be used, conform to the essential requirements of an office workstation. Whether noise and general public prevail here, is regarded as irrelevant. Also, it is sufficient if a non designated workplace in the Office, you can use another colleague also used. Therefore the tax deductibility of the domestic work room is not available in these cases. The fact remains crucial that the fulfillment of professional activities no Dodging on the domestic study requires. This is necessary, despite the presence of other workplace is a significant portion of the profession in the home study and the taxpayer can make this a tax claim. Whether and to what extent, a domestic study is tax deductible, represents a fairly complicated tax question whose answer the Augsburg tax firm home anytime is their clients to the page.