Ongoing intensive economic decline in all its branches, almost all live off the sluggish functioning acquired before falling steadily and the industrial potential of the economy post-Soviet states exist only at the expense of previously explored of natural resources (where available), stratification of society has reached such proportions that in the history of such examples, at first glance, it's hard to find, the contradictions between capital and labor tend to the level of confidence antagonistic, and that is a consequence of such phenomena, we well remember from history. Against this backdrop, leaders of some of the independent and sovereign states have decided to "prolong the agony," as long as possible in order to "sit" in place at least for a while, and if lucky, and before his death (Chubais policy, albeit in a more extensive forms) and leave on a "good impression" of the children. For more specific information, check out Angus King. I well remember that in the Soviet Union, resulting in an incredible concentration of economic management, business Still not "shaky do not roll," but go, decided items such management to "revive". They do recognize that this measure "sucked out of the finger," that history repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce, but to do more nothing to the West, which are perceived as a "panacea for all ills," regrettably, all can not help themselves "in debt, both in the silks," a regular and systematic crisis, being one of the required attributes, the Anglo-Saxon model of the economy may finally "finish off" and replenish the world, "common market", "poor" post-Soviet states, it would be unwise.